Paper detail

Modeling optical and UV polarization of AGNs II. Polarization imaging and complex reprocessing

We model the spectropolarimetric signature resulting from the radiative coupling between the innermost parts of active galactic nuclei (AGNs). We use a new public version of STOKES, a Monte Carlo radiative transfer code presented in the first paper of this series. The code has been significantly improved for computational speed and polarization imaging has been implemented. We couple continuum sources with equatorial scattering regions, polar outflows, and toroidal obscuring dust and we study the resulting polarization. We compute a grid of thermal AGN models for different half-opening angles of the torus and polar winds. We also consider a range of optical depths for equatorial and polar electron scattering and investigate how the model geometry influences the type-1/type-2 polarization dichotomy for thermal AGNs. We put new constrains on the inflowing medium within the inner walls of the torus. The inflow should be confined to the common equatorial plane of the torus and the accretion disc and have a radial optical depth of 1 < tau < 3. Our modeling of type-1 AGNs also indicates that the torus is more likely to have a large (~ 60°) half-opening angle. Polarization perpendicular to the axis of the torus may arise at a type-1 viewing angle for a torus half-opening angle of 30°- 45° or polar outflows with an optical depth near unity. Our modeling suggests that most Seyfert-2 AGN must have a half-opening angle > 60° to match the level of perpendicular polarization expected. If outflows are collimated by the torus inner walls, they must not be optically thick (tau < 1) in order to preserve the polarization dichotomy. The wind's optical depth is found not to play a critical role for the degree of polarization of type-2 thermal AGNs but it has a significant impact on the type-1/type-2 polarization dichotomy when the optical depth exceeds tau = 0.3.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.