Paper detail

Modeling optical and UV polarization of AGNs I. Imprints of individual scattering regions

[abridged] We investigate the effects of various AGN scattering region geometries on the polarized flux. We introduce a new, publicly available Monte Carlo radiative transfer code, Stokes, which models polarization induced by scattering off free electrons and dust grains. We find that the shape of the funnel of the dusty torus has a significant impact on the polarization efficiency. A compact torus with a steep inner surface scatters more light toward type-2 viewing angles than a large torus of the same half-opening angle, theta0. For theta0 < 53 deg, the scattered light is polarized perpendicularly to the symmetry axis, whilst for theta0 > 60 deg it is polarized parallel to the symmetry axis. In between these intervals the orientation of the polarization depends on the viewing angle. The degree of polarization ranges between 0% and 20% and is wavelength-independent for a large range of theta0. Observed wavelength-independent optical and near-UV polarization thus does not necessarily imply electron scattering. For polar dust, scattering spectra are reddened for type-1 viewing angles, and made bluer for type-2 viewing angles. Polar electron-scattering cones are very efficient polarizers at type-2 viewing angles, whilst the polarized flux of the torus is weak. We predict that the net polarization of Seyfert-2 galaxies decreases with luminosity, and conclude that the degree of polarization should be correlated with the relative strength of the thermal IR flux. We find that a flattened, equatorial, electron-scattering disk, of relatively low optical depth, reproduces type-1 polarization. This is insensitive to the exact geometry, but the observed polarization requires a limited range of optical depth.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.