Paper detail

Modeling of Charged-Neutral Kaon Fluctuations as a Signature of DCC Production in A--A Collisions

Anomalous event-by-event fluctuations of the relative yields of neutral (K$^0_s$) and charged kaon (K$^\pm$) have been predicted to yield a signature for the formation of Disoriented Chiral Condensate (DCC) in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. In this work, we model the production and decay of DCCs in the context of heavy-ion collisions at the Large Hadron Collider, and estimate the sensitivity of large acceptance detectors, such as the ALICE detector, towards the identification of such anomalous decays. Our study is based on the robust statistical observable, $ν_{\rm dyn}$, known for its sensitivity to dynamical fluctuations. We first present simulations without DCCs, based on the HIJING and AMPT models, in order to establish an approximate reference for the magnitude of $ν_{\rm dyn}({\rm K}^{\pm},{\rm K}^{0}_{s})$ and its centrality evolution in Pb--Pb collisions at the TeV energy scale. We next introduce simple phenomenological models of K$^0_s$ vs. K$^\pm$ event-by-event yield fluctuations, which we use to study the feasibility and sensitivity of detection of the production of DCCs in heavy-ion collisions. Although the precision of models such as HIJING and AMPT limit their use as absolute references and thus render anomalous fluctuations difficult to define precisely, our studies demonstrate that the magnitude of $ν_{\rm dyn}({\rm K}^{\pm},{\rm K}^{0}_{s})$ is in fact very sensitive to the presence of small admixture of DCCs in normal non-DCC events. Consequently, while large values of $ν_{\rm dyn}({\rm K}^{\pm},{\rm K}^{0}_{s})$ may not be sufficient to identify the existence of DCCs, nonetheless they constitute a first and necessary condition to signal their possible production in heavy-ion collisions.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.