Paper detail

Modeling Nearest Neighbor distributions of biased tracers using Hybrid Effective Field Theory

We investigate the application of Hybrid Effective Field Theory (HEFT) -- which combines a Lagrangian bias expansion with subsequent particle dynamics from $N$-body simulations -- to the modeling of $k$-Nearest Neighbor Cumulative Distribution Functions ($k{\rm NN}$-${\rm CDF}$s) of biased tracers of the cosmological matter field. The $k{\rm NN}$-${\rm CDF}$s are sensitive to all higher order connected $N$-point functions in the data, but are computationally cheap to compute. We develop the formalism to predict the $k{\rm NN}$-${\rm CDF}$s of discrete tracers of a continuous field from the statistics of the continuous field itself. Using this formalism, we demonstrate how $k{\rm NN}$-${\rm CDF}$ statistics of a set of biased tracers, such as halos or galaxies, of the cosmological matter field can be modeled given a set of low-redshift HEFT component fields and bias parameter values. These are the same ingredients needed to predict the two-point clustering. For a specific sample of halos, we show that both the two-point clustering \textit{and} the $k{\rm NN}$-${\rm CDF}$s can be well-fit on quasi-linear scales ($\gtrsim 20 h^{-1}{\rm Mpc}$) by the second-order HEFT formalism with the \textit{same values} of the bias parameters, implying that joint modeling of the two is possible. Finally, using a Fisher matrix analysis, we show that including $k{\rm NN}$-${\rm CDF}$ measurements over the range of allowed scales in the HEFT framework can improve the constraints on $σ_8$ by roughly a factor of $3$, compared to the case where only two-point measurements are considered. Combining the statistical power of $k{\rm NN}$ measurements with the modeling power of HEFT, therefore, represents an exciting prospect for extracting greater information from small-scale cosmological clustering.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.