Abstract

We use the Ly-αα Mass Association Scheme (LyMAS; Peirani et al. 2014) to predict cross-correlations at z=2.5z=2.5 between dark matter halos and transmitted flux in the Ly-αα forest, and compare to cross-correlations measured for quasars and damped Ly-αα systems (DLAs) from the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) by Font-Ribera et al. (2012, 2013). We calibrate LyMAS using Horizon-AGN hydrodynamical cosmological simulations of a (100 h−1 Mpc)3(100\ h^{-1}\ \mathrm{Mpc})^3 comoving volume. We apply this calibration to a (1 h−1 Gpc)3(1\ h^{-1}\ \mathrm{Gpc})^3 simulation realized with 204832048^3 dark matter particles. In the 100 h−1h^{-1} Mpc box, LyMAS reproduces the halo-flux correlations computed from the full hydrodynamic gas distribution very well. In the 1 h−1h^{-1} Gpc box, the amplitude of the large scale cross-correlation tracks the halo bias bhb_h as expected. We provide empirical fitting functions that describe our numerical results. In the transverse separation bins used for the BOSS analyses, LyMAS cross-correlation predictions follow linear theory accurately down to small scales. Fitting the BOSS measurements requires inclusion of random velocity errors; we find best-fit RMS velocity errors of 399 km s−1^{-1} and 252 km s−1^{-1} for quasars and DLAs, respectively. We infer bias-weighted mean halo masses of Mh/1012 h−1M⊙=2.19−0.15+0.16M_h/10^{12}\ h^{-1}M_\odot=2.19^{+0.16}_{-0.15} and 0.69−0.14+0.160.69^{+0.16}_{-0.14} for the host halos of quasars and DLAs, with ∼0.2\sim 0.2 dex systematic uncertainty associated with redshift evolution, IGM parameters, and selection of data fitting range.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.