Paper detail

Modeling Intratumor Gene Copy Number Heterogeneity using Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization data

Tumorigenesis is an evolutionary process which involves a significant number of genomic rearrangements typically coupled with changes in the gene copy number profiles of numerous cells. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a cytogenetic technique which allows counting copy numbers of genes in single cells. The study of cancer progression using FISH data has received considerably less attention compared to other types of cancer datasets. In this work we focus on inferring likely tumor progression pathways using publicly available FISH data. We model the evolutionary process as a Markov chain in the positive integer cone Z_+^g where g is the number of genes examined with FISH. Compared to existing work which oversimplifies reality by assuming independence of copy number changes, our model is able to capture dependencies. We model the probability distribution of a dataset with hierarchical log-linear models, a popular probabilistic model of count data. Our choice provides an attractive trade-off between parsimony and good data fit. We prove a theorem of independent interest which provides necessary and sufficient conditions for reconstructing oncogenetic trees. Using this theorem we are able to capitalize on the wealth of inter-tumor phylogenetic methods. We show how to produce tumor phylogenetic trees which capture the dynamics of cancer progression. We validate our proposed method on a breast tumor dataset.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.