Paper detail

Modeling interspur interactions as a potential mechanism of the FLASH effect

The mechanism responsible for the FLASH effect, normal tissue sparing by ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) irradiation with isoeffective tumor control compared to conventional dose rate (CDR) irradiation, remains undetermined. Here we investigate the contribution of interspur interactions (interactions between radiolytic species of individual particle tracks) to overall radiochemical interactions as a function of irradiation parameters, and suggest an increase in interspur interaction as a potential mechanism for tissue sparing in FLASH radiation therapy. We construct a model that analytically represents the spatiotemporal distribution of spurs in a target volume as a function of irradiation parameters (e.g. dose, dose rate, linear energy transfer), and quantifies the effect of interspur interactions on the ongoing radiochemistry. Spurs evolve under a simplified reaction-diffusion equation with parameters based on Monte Carlo simulations, and interspur interaction is quantified by calculating the expected values of interspur overlap in the target. The model demonstrates that for any set of irradiation parameters, a minimum critical dose and dose rate are necessary to induce significant interspur interaction, and that interspur interactions correlate negatively with beam linear energy transfer at a fixed dose. The model suggests optimal beam parameters, including dose, dose rate, linear energy transfer, and pulse structure, to maximize interspur interactions. Depending on the rate of radical scavenging in the target, which limits interspur interaction, this model predicts that the irradiation parameters necessary to elicit the FLASH effect may coincide with an onset of significant interspur interactions, suggesting that interspur interaction may be the underlying mechanism of the FLASH effect.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.