Paper detail

Modeling Grain Alignment by Radiative Torques and Hydrogen Formation Torques in Reflection Nebula

Reflection nebulae--dense cores--illuminated by surrounding stars offer a unique opportunity to directly test our quantitative model of grain alignment based on radiative torques (RATs) and to explore new effects arising from additional torques. In this paper, we first perform detailed modeling of grain alignment by RATs for the IC 63 reflection nebula illuminated both by a nearby $γ$ Cas star and the diffuse interstellar radiation field. We calculate linear polarization $p_λ$ of background stars by radiatively aligned grains and explore the variation of fractional polarization ($p_λ/A_V$) with visual extinction $A_{V}$ across the cloud. Our results show that the variation of $p_{V}/A_{V}$ versus $A_{V}$ from the dayside of IC 63 to its center can be represented by a power-law ($p_{V}/A_{V}\propto A_{V}^η$) with different slopes depending on $A_{V}$. We find a shallow slope $η\sim- 0.1$ for $A_{V}< 3$ and a very steep slope $η\sim -2$ for $A_{V}> 4$. We then consider the effects of additional torques due to H$_{2}$ formation and model grain alignment by joint action of RATs and H$_2$ torques. We find that $p_{V}/A_{V}$ tends to increase with an increasing magnitude of H$_{2}$ torques. In particular, the theoretical predictions obtained for $p_{V}/A_{V}$ and peak wavelength $λ_{\max}$ in this case show an improved agreement with the observational data. Our results reinforce the predictive power of the RAT alignment mechanism in a broad range of environmental conditions and show the effect of pinwheel torques in environments with efficient H$_2$ formation. Physical parameters involved in H$_2$ formation may be constrained using detailed modeling of grain alignment combined with observational data. In addition, we discuss implications of our modeling for interpreting latest observational data by {\it Planck} and other ground-based instruments.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.