Paper detail

Modeling Galaxy-Mass Correlations in Dissipationless Simulations

We use high-resolution dissipationless simulations of the concordance flat LCDM model to make predictions for the galaxy--mass (GM) correlations and compare them to the recent SDSS weak lensing measurements.We use a simple observationally motivated scheme to assign luminosities and colors to the halos.This allows us to closely match the selection criteria used to define observational samples.The simulations reproduce the observed GM correlation function and its observed dependencies on luminosity and color.The luminosity dependence of the correlation function is primarily determined by the changing relative contribution of central and satellite galaxies at different luminosities. The color dependence of the GM correlations reflects the difference in the typical environments of blue and red galaxies. We also find agreement between the predicted and observed cross-bias, b_x=b/r,at all probed scales.The GM correlation coefficient, r, is close to unity on scales >1/h Mpc.The cross bias is thus expected to measure the actual bias of galaxy clustering on these scales.The aperture mass-to-light ratio is independent of galaxy color.The aperture mass scales approximately linearly with luminosity at L_r>10^{10}h^{-2} Lsun, while at lower luminosities the scaling is shallower: L_r^{0.5}. We show that most of the luminous galaxies (M_r<-21) are near the centers of their halos and their GM correlation function at r<100/h kpc can therefore be interpreted as the average dark matter density profile of these galaxies. We find that for galaxies in a given narrow luminosity range, there is a broad and possibly non-gaussian distribution of halo virial masses. Therefore, the average relation between mass and luminosity derived from the weak lensing analyses should be interpreted with caution.

preprint2004arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.