Paper detail

Modeling epitaxial film growth of C$_{60}$ revisited

Epitaxial films evolve on time and length scales that are inaccessible to atomistic computer simulation methods like molecular dynamics (MD). To numerically predict properties for such systems, a common strategy is to employ kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) simulations, for which one needs to know the transition rates of the involved elementary steps. The main challenge is thus to formulate a consistent model for the set of transition rates and to determine its parameters. Here we revisit a well-studied model system, the epitaxial film growth of the fullerene C$_{60}$ on an ordered C$_{60}$ substrate(111). We implement a systematic multiscale approach in which we determine transition rates through MD simulations of specifically designed initial configurations. These rates follow Arrhenius' law, from which we extract energy barriers and attempt rates. We discuss the issue of detailed balance for the resulting rates. Finally, we study the morphology of subatomic and multilayer film growth and compare simulation results to experiments. Our model enables further studies on multi-layer growth processes of C$_{60}$ on other substrates.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.