Paper detail

Modeling disks and magnetic outflows around a forming massive star: I. Investigating the two layer-structure of the accretion disk

Like their lower mass siblings, massive protostars can be expected to: a) be surrounded by circumstellar disks and b) launch magnetically-driven jets and outflows. The disk formation and global evolution is thereby controlled by advection of angular momentum from large scales, the efficiency of magnetic braking and the resistivity of the medium, and the internal thermal and magnetic pressures of the disk. We perform a series of 30 simulations of a massive star forming from the gravitational collapse of a molecular cloud threaded by an initially-uniform magnetic field, starting from different values for the mass of the cloud, its initial density and rotation profiles, its rotational energy content, the magnetic field strength, and the resistivity of the material. The gas and dust is modeled with the methods of resistive magnetohydrodynamics, also considering radiation transport of thermal emission and self-gravity. After the initial infall phase dominated by the gravitational collapse, an accretion disk is formed, shortly followed by the launching of magnetically-driven outflows. Two layers can be distinguished in the accretion disk: a thin layer, vertically supported by thermal pressure, and a thick layer, vertically supported by magnetic pressure. We observe the effects of magnetic braking in the inner ~50 au of the disk at late times in our fiducial case. The parameter study reveals that the size of the disk is mostly determined by the density and rotation profiles of the initial mass reservoir and not by the magnetic field strength. Magnetic pressure can slightly increase the size of the accretion disk, while magnetic braking is more relevant in the innermost parts of the disk as opposed to the outer disk. From the parameter study, we infer that multiple initial conditions for the onset of gravitational collapse are able to produce a given disk size and protostellar mass.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.