Paper detail

Modeling Dependence Dynamics of Air Pollution: Pollution Risk Simulation and Prediction of PM$_{2.5}$ Levels

The first part of this paper introduces a portfolio approach for quantifying the risk measures of pollution risk in the presence of dependence of PM$_{2.5}$ concentration of cities. The model is based on a copula dependence structure. For assessing model parameters, we analyze a limited data set of PM$_{2.5}$ levels of Beijing, Tianjin, Chengde, Hengshui, and Xingtai. This process reveals a better fit for the t-copula dependence structure with generalized hyperbolic marginal distributions for the PM$_{2.5}$ log-ratios of the cities. Furthermore, we show how to efficiently simulate risk measures clean-air-at-risk and conditional clean-air-at-risk using importance sampling and stratified importance sampling. Our numerical results show that clean-air-at-risk at 0.01 probability level reaches up to 352 μgm-3 (initial PM$_{2.5}$ concentrations of cities are assumed to be 100 μgm-3) for the constructed sample portfolio, and proposed methods are much more efficient than a naive simulation for computing the exceeding probabilities and conditional excesses. In the second part, we predict PM$_{2.5}$ levels of the next three-hour period of four Chinese cities, Beijing, Chengde, Xingtai, and Zhangjiakou. For this purpose, we use the pollution and weather data collected from the stations located in these four cities. Instead of coding the machine learning algorithms, we employ a state-of-the-art machine learning library, Torch7. This allows us to try out the state-of-the-art machine learning methods like long short-term memory (LSTM). Unfortunately, due to small data size and lots of missing values (when we combined the features of the cities) in the data, LSTM does not perform better than a multilayer perceptron. However, we get a classification accuracy above 0.72 on the test data.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.