Paper detail

Modeling Cross-view Interaction Consistency for Paired Egocentric Interaction Recognition

With the development of Augmented Reality (AR), egocentric action recognition (EAR) plays important role in accurately understanding demands from the user. However, EAR is designed to help recognize human-machine interaction in single egocentric view, thus difficult to capture interactions between two face-to-face AR users. Paired egocentric interaction recognition (PEIR) is the task to collaboratively recognize the interactions between two persons with the videos in their corresponding views. Unfortunately, existing PEIR methods always directly use linear decision function to fuse the features extracted from two corresponding egocentric videos, which ignore consistency of interaction in paired egocentric videos. The consistency of interactions in paired videos, and features extracted from them are correlated to each other. On top of that, we propose to build the relevance between two views using biliear pooling, which capture the consistency of two views in feature-level. Specifically, each neuron in the feature maps from one view connects to the neurons from another view, which guarantee the compact consistency between two views. Then all possible paired neurons are used for PEIR for the inside consistent information of them. To be efficient, we use compact bilinear pooling with Count Sketch to avoid directly computing outer product in bilinear. Experimental results on dataset PEV shows the superiority of the proposed methods on the task PEIR.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.