Paper detail

Modeling CO Emission: I. CO as a Column Density Tracer and the X-Factor in Molecular Clouds

Theoretical and observational investigations have indicated that the abundance of carbon monoxide (CO) is very sensitive to intrinsic properties of the gaseous medium, such as density, metallicity, and the background UV field. In order to accurately interpret CO observations, it is thus important to understand how well CO traces the gas, which in molecular clouds (MCs) is predominantly molecular hydrogen (H2). Recent hydrodynamic simulations by Glover & Mac Low have explicitly followed the formation and destruction of molecules in model MCs under varying conditions, confirming that CO formation strongly depends on the cloud properties. Conversely, the H2 formation is primarily determined by the age of the MC. We apply radiative transfer calculations to these MC models in order to investigate the properties of CO line emission. We focus on integrated CO (J=1-0) intensities emerging from individual clouds, including its relationship to the total, H2, and CO column densities, as well as the "X factor," the ratio of H2 column density to CO intensity. Models with high CO abundances have a threshold CO intensity ~65 K km/s at sufficiently large extinctions. Clouds with low CO abundances show no such intensity thresholds. The distribution of H2 column densities are well described as log-normal functions, though the distributions of CO intensities and column densities are usually not log-normal. In general, the PDFs of the integrated intensity do not follow the distribution functions of CO column densities. In the model with Milky Way-like conditions, the X factor is in agreement with the near constant value determined from observations. In clouds with lower CO abundances the X factor can vary appreciably - sometimes by > 4 orders of magnitude. In models with high densities, the CO line is fully saturated, so that the X factor is directly proportional to the molecular column density.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.