Paper detail

Modeling and predicting measured response time of cloud-based web services using long-memory time series

Predicting cloud performance from user's perspective is a complex task, because of several factors involved in providing the service to the consumer. In this work, the response time of 10 real-world services is analyzed. We have observed long memory in terms of the measured response time of the CPU-intensive services and statistically verified this observation using estimators of the Hurst exponent. Then, naïve, mean, autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and autoregressive fractionally integrated moving average (ARFIMA) methods are used to forecast the future values of quality of service (QoS) at runtime. Results of the cross-validation over the 10 datasets show that the long-memory ARFIMA model provides the mean of 37.5 % and the maximum of 57.8 % reduction in the forecast error when compared to the short-memory ARIMA model according to the standard error measure of mean absolute percentage error. Our work implies that consideration of the long-range dependence in QoS data can help to improve the selection of services according to their possible future QoS values.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.