Paper detail

Model theory of differential fields with finite group actions

Let G be a finite group. We explore the model theoretic properties of the class of differential fields of characteristic zero in m commuting derivations equipped with a G-action by differential field automorphisms. In the language of G-differential rings (i.e. the language of rings with added symbols for derivations and automorphisms), we prove that this class has a model-companion - denoted G-DCF. We then deploy the model-theoretic tools developed in the first author's paper [11] to show that any model of G-DCF is supersimple (but unstable when G is nontrivial), a PAC-differential field (and hence differentially large in the sense of the second author and Tressl [30]), and admits elimination of imaginaries after adding a tuple of parameters. We also address model-completeness and supersimplicity of theories of bounded PAC-differential fields (extending the results of Chatzidakis-Pillay [5] on bounded PAC-fields).

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.