Paper detail

Model of haplotype and phenotype in the evolution of a duplicated autoregulatory activator

Gene duplication is believed to play a major role in the evolution of genomic complexity. The presence of a duplicate removes the constraint of natural selection upon the gene, leading to its likely loss of function or, occasionally, the gain of a novel one. Alternately, a pleiotropic gene might partition its functions among its duplicates, thus preserving both copies. Duplicate genes is not a novelty for diploid genotypes, but only for haplotypes. In this paper, we study the consequences of regulatory interactions in diploid genotypes and explore how the context of allelic interactions gives rise to dynamical phenotypes that enable duplicate genes to spread in a population. The regulatory network we study is that of a single autoregulatory activator gene, and the two copies of the gene diverge either as alleles in a diploid species or as duplicates in haploids. These differences are in their transcriptional ability -- either via alterations to its activating domain, or to its cis-regulatory binding repertoire. When cis-regulatory changes are introduced that partition multiple regulatory triggers among the duplicates, it is shown that mutually exclusive expression states of the duplicates that emerge are accompanied by a back-up facility: when a highly expressed gene is deleted, the previously unexpressed duplicate copy compensates for it. The diploid version of the regulatory network model can account for allele-specific expression variants, and a model of inheritance of the haplotype network enables us to trace the evolutionary consequence of heterozygous phenotypes. This is modelled for the variations in the activating domain of one copy, whereby stable as well as transiently bursting oscillations ensue in single cells. The evolutionary model shows that these phenotypic states accessible to a diploid, heterozygous genotype enable the spread of a duplicated haplotype.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.