Paper detail

Model-independent Probe of anomalous heavy neutral Higgs bosons at the LHC

We first formulate, in the framework of effective Lagrangian, the general form of the effective interactions of the lightest Higgs boson h and a heavier neutral Higgs boson H in a multi-Higgs system taking account of Higgs mixing effect. We regard h as the discovered Higgs boson which has been shown to be consistent with the standard model (SM) Higgs boson. The obtained effective interactions contain extra parameters reflecting the Higgs mixing effect. Next, We study the constraints on the anomalous coupling constants of H from both the requirement of the unitarity of the S matrix and the exclusion bounds on the SM Higgs boson obtained from the experimental data at the 7--8 TeV LHC. From this we obtain the available range of the anomalous coupling constants of H, with which H is not excluded by the yet known theoretical and experimental constraints. We then study the signatures of H at the 14 TeV LHC. In this paper, we suggest taking weak-boson scattering and pp to VH* to VVV as sensitive processes for probing H model independently at the 14 TeV LHC. We take several examples with the anomalous HVV coupling constants in the available ranges to do the numerical study. a full tree-level calculation at the hadron level is given with signals and backgrounds carefully calculated. We impose a series of proper kinematic cuts to effectively suppress the backgrounds. It is shown that, in both the VV scattering and the pp to VH* to VVV processes, H boson can be discovered from the invariant mass distributions of the final state particles with reasonable integrated luminosity. Especially, in the pp to VH* to VVV process, the invariant mass distribution of the final state jets can show a clear resonance peak of H. Finally, we propose several physical observables from which the values of the anomalous coupling constants f_W and f_{WW} can be measured experimentally.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.