Paper detail

Model independent determination of the CKM phase $γ$ using input from $D^0-\bar{D}^0$ mixing

We present a new, amplitude model-independent method to measure the CP violation parameter $γ$ in $B^- \to DK^-$ and related decays. Information on charm interference parameters, usually obtained from charm threshold data, is obtained from charm mixing. By splitting the phase space of the $D$ meson decay into several bins, enough information can be gained to measure $γ$ without input from the charm threshold. We demonstrate the feasibility of this approach with a simulation study of $B^- \to DK^-$ with $D \to K^+ π^- π^+ π^-$. We compare the performance of our novel approach to that of a previously proposed binned analysis which uses charm interference parameters obtained from threshold data. While both methods provide useful constraints, the combination of the two by far outperforms either of them applied on their own. Such an analysis would provide a highly competitive measurement of $γ$. Our simulation studies indicate, subject to assumptions about data yields and the amplitude structure of $D^0 \to K^+ π^- π^+ π^-$, a statistical uncertainty on $γ$ of $\sim 12^{\circ}$ with existing data and $\sim 4^{\circ}$ for the LHCb-upgrade.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.