Paper detail

Model Independent Analysis of Interactions between Dark Matter and Various Quarks

Present and future expected limits on interactions between dark matter and various quarks are thoroughly investigated in a model-independent way. In particular, the constraints on the interactions from the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) experiment are carefully considered with focusing on mono jet + missing transverse energy, mono b-jet + missing transverse energy, and top quark(s) + missing transverse energy channels. Model-independent upper limits (expected limits) on the cross section times acceptance for non-standard model events are derived at 7 TeV (8 or 14 TeV) running of the LHC experiment. With assuming that the dark matter is a singlet real scalar or a singlet Majorana fermion, we also put constraints on several operators describing its interactions with up, down, strange, charm, bottom and top quarks. These constraints are compared to those obtained by cosmological and astrophysical observations of the dark matter.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.