Paper detail

Model for Atomic Oxygen Visible Line Emissions in Comet C/1995 O1 Hale-Bopp

We have recently developed a coupled chemistry-emission model for the green and red-doublet emissions of atomic oxygen on comet Hyakutake. In the present work we applied our model to comet Hale-Bopp, which had an order of magnitude higher H2O production rate than comet Hyakutake, to evaluate the photochemistry associated with the production and loss of O(1S) and O(1D) atoms and emission processes of green and red-doublet lines. We present the wavelength-dependent photo-attenuation rates for different photodissociation processes forming O(1S) and O(1D). The calculated radiative efficiency profiles of O(1S) and O(1D) atoms show that in comet Hale-Bopp the green and red-doublet emissions are emitted mostly above radial distances of 10^3 and 10^4 km, respectively. The model calculated [OI] 6300 A emission surface brightness and average intensity over the Fabry-P{é}rot spectrometer field of view are consistent with the observation of Morgenthaler et al. (2001), while the intensity ratio of green to red-doublet emission is in agreement with the observation of Zhang et al. (2001). In comet Hale-Bopp, for cometocentric distances less than 10^5 km, the intensity of [OI] 6300 A line is mainly governed by photodissociation of H2O. Beyond 10^5 km, O(1D) production is dominated by photodissociation of the water photochemical daughter product OH. Whereas the [OI] 5577 A emission line is controlled by photodissociation of both H2O and CO2. The calculated mean excess energy in various photodissociation processes show that the photodissociation of CO2 can produce O(1S) atoms with higher excess velocity compared to the photodissociation of H2O. Thus, our model calculations suggest that involvement of multiple sources in the formation of O(1S) could be a reason for the larger width of green line than that of red-doublet emission lines observed in several comets.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.