Paper detail

Model comparison of the dark matter profiles of Fornax, Sculptor, Carina and Sextans

We use orbit based dynamical models to fit the 2nd and 4th moments of the line of sight velocity distributions of the Fornax, Sculptor, Carina and Sextans dwarf spheroidal galaxies. Our goal is to compare dark matter profile models of these four systems using Bayesian evidence. We consider NFW, Einasto and several cored profiles for their dark halos and present the probability distribution functions of the model parameters. When considering each system separately, we find there is no preference for one of these specific parametric density profiles. However, the combined evidence shows that it is unlikely that all galaxies are embedded in the same type of cored profiles of the form ρ_{DM} \propto 1/(1 + r^2)^{β/2}, where β= 3, 4. For each galaxy, we also obtain an almost model independent, and therefore accurate, measurement of the logarithmic slope of the dark matter density distribution at a radius ~ r_{-3}, i.e. where the logarithmic slope of the stellar density profile is -3. This slope ranges from ~ -1.4 for Fornax to ~ -1.1 for Sextans, both at ~ 1 kpc. All our best fit models essentially have the same mass distribution over a large range in radius (from just below r_{-3} to the last measured data point). This remarkable finding likely implies much stronger constraints on the characteristics that subhalos extracted from cosmological simulations should have in order to host the dSph galaxies around the Milky Way.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.