Paper detail

Model Breaking Measure for Cosmological Surveys

Recent observations have led to the establishment of the concordance LCDM model for cosmology. A number of experiments are being planned to shed light on dark energy, dark matter, inflation and gravity, which are the key components of the model. To optimize and compare the reach of these surveys, several figures of merit have been proposed. They are based on either the forecasted precision on the LCDM model and its expansion, or on the expected ability to distinguish two models. We propose here another figure of merit that quantifies the capacity of future surveys to rule out the LCDM model. It is based on a measure of the difference in volume of observable space that the future surveys will constrain with and without imposing the model. This model breaking figure of merit is easy to compute and can lead to different survey optimizations than other metrics. We illustrate its impact using a simple combination of supernovae and BAO mock observations and compare the respective merit of these probes to challenge LCDM. We discuss how this approach would impact the design of future cosmological experiments.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.