Paper detail

Mode lifetimes of stellar oscillations - Implications for asteroseismology

Successful inference from asteroseismology relies on at least two things: that the oscillations in the stars have amplitudes large enough to be clearly observable; and that the oscillations themselves be stable enough to enable precise measurements of mode frequencies and other parameters. Solar-like p modes are damped by convection, and hence the stability of the modes depends on the lifetime. We seek a simple scaling relation between the mean lifetime of the most prominent solar-like p modes in stars, and the fundamental stellar parameters. We base our search for a relation on use of stellar equilibrium and pulsation computations of a grid of stellar models, and the first asteroseismic results on lifetimes of main-sequence, sub-giant and red-giant stars. We find that the mean lifetimes of all three classes of solar-like stars scale like $T_{\rm eff}^{-4}$ (where $T_{\rm eff}$ is the effective temperature). When this relation is combined with the well-known scaling relation of Kjeldsen & Bedding (1995) for mode amplitudes observed in narrow-band intensity observations, we obtain the unexpected result that the height (the maximum power spectral density) of mode peaks in the frequency power spectrum scales as $g^{-2}$ (where $g$ is the surface gravity). As it is the mode height (and not the amplitude) that fixes the S/N at which the modes can be measured, and as $g$ changes only slowly along the main sequence, this suggests that stars cooler than the Sun might be as good targets for asteroseismology as their hotter counterparts. When observations are instead made in Doppler velocity, our results imply that mode height then does increase with increasing effective temperature.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.