Paper detail

Mode conversion of two-fluid shocks in a partially-ionised, isothermal, stratified atmosphere

The plasma of the lower solar atmosphere consists of mostly neutral particles, whereas the upper solar atmosphere is mostly ionised particles and electrons. A shock that propagates upwards in the solar atmosphere therefore undergoes a transition where the dominant fluid is either neutral or ionised. An upwards propagating shock also passes a point where the sound and Alfvén speed are equal. At this point the energy of the acoustic shock can separated into fast and slow components. How the energy is distributed between the two modes depends on the angle of magnetic field. The separation of neutral and ionised species in a gravitationally stratified atmosphere is investigated. The role of two-fluid effects on the structure of the shocks post-mode-conversion and the frictional heating is quantified for different levels of collisional coupling. Two-fluid numerical simulations are performed using the (P\underline{I}P) code of a wave steepening into a shock in an isothermal, partially-ionised atmosphere. The collisional coefficient is varied to investigate the regimes where the plasma and neutral species are weakly, strongly and finitely coupled. The propagation speeds of the compressional waves hosted by neutral and ionised species vary, therefore velocity drift between the two species is produced as the plasma attempts to propagate faster than the neutrals. This is most extreme for a fast-mode shock. We find that the collisional coefficient drastically changes the features present in the system, specifically the mode conversion height, type of shocks present, and the finite shock widths created by the two-fluid effects. In the finitely-coupled regime fast-mode shock widths can exceed the pressure scale height leading to a new potential observable of two-fluid effects in the lower solar atmosphere.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.