Paper detail

MOCCA Code for Star Cluster Simulations - II. Comparison with N-body Simulations

We describe a major upgrade of a Monte Carlo code which has previously been used for many studies of dense star clusters. We outline the steps needed in order to calibrate the results of the new Monte Carlo code against $N$-body simulations for large $N$ systems, up to $N=200000$. The new version of the Monte Carlo code (called MOCCA), in addition to the features of the old version, incorporates the direct Fewbody integrator (Fregeau et al. 2004) for three- and four-body interactions, and a new treatment of the escape process based on Fukushige & Heggie (2000). Now stars which fulfil the escape criterion are not removed immediately, but can stay in the system for a certain time which depends on the excess of the energy of a star above the escape energy. They are called potential escapers. With the addition of the Fewbody integrator the code can follow all interaction channels which are important for the rate of creation of various types of objects observed in star clusters, and ensures that the energy generation by binaries is treated in a manner similar to the $N$-body model. There are at most three new parameters which have to be adjusted against $N$-body simulations for large $N$: two (or one, depending on the chosen approach) connected with the escape process, and one responsible for the determination of the interaction probabilities. The values adopted for the free parameters have at most a weak dependence on $N$. They allow MOCCA to reproduce $N$-body results with reasonable precision, not only for the rate of cluster evolution and the cluster mass distribution, but also for the detailed distributions of mass and binding energy of binaries. Additionally, the code can follow the rate of formation of blue stragglers and black hole - black hole binaries.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.