Paper detail

MLLS: Minimum Length Link Scheduling Under Physical Interference Model

We study a fundamental problem called Minimum Length Link Scheduling (MLLS) which is crucial to the efficient operations of wireless networks. Given a set of communication links of arbitrary length spread and assume each link has one unit of traffic demand in wireless networks, the problem MLLS seeks a schedule for all links (to satisfy all demands) of minimum number of time-slots such that the links assigned to the same time-slot do not conflict with each other under the physical interference model. In this paper, we will explore this problem under three important transmission power control settings: linear power control, uniform power control and arbitrary power control. We design a suite of new and novel scheduling algorithms and conduct explicit complexity analysis to demonstrate their efficiency. Our algorithms can account for the presence of background noises in wireless networks. We also investigate the fractional case of the problem MLLS where each link has a fractional demand. We propose an efficient greedy algorithm of the approximation ratio at most $(K+1)^{2}ω$.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.