Paper detail

Mixing time of the Chung--Diaconis--Graham random process

Define $(X_n)$ on $\mathbf{Z}/q\mathbf{Z}$ by $X_{n+1} = 2X_n + b_n$, where the steps $b_n$ are chosen independently at random from $-1, 0, +1$. The mixing time of this random walk is known to be at most $1.02 \log_2 q$ for almost all odd $q$ (Chung--Diaconis--Graham, 1987), and at least $1.004 \log_2 q$ (Hildebrand, 2008). We identify a constant $c = 1.01136\dots$ such that the mixing time is $(c+o(1))\log_2 q$ for almost all odd $q$. In general, the mixing time of the Markov chain $X_{n+1} = a X_n + b_n$ modulo $q$, where $a$ is a fixed positive integer and the steps $b_n$ are i.i.d. with some given distribution in $\mathbf{Z}$, is related to the entropy of a corresponding self-similar Cantor-like measure (such as a Bernoulli convolution). We estimate the mixing time up to a $1+o(1)$ factor whenever the entropy exceeds $(\log a)/2$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.