Paper detail

Mixing of Clumpy Supernova Ejecta into Molecular Clouds

Several lines of evidence, from isotopic analyses of meteorites to studies of the Sun's elemental and isotopic composition, indicate that the solar system was contaminated early in its evolution by ejecta from a nearby supernova (SN). Previous models have invoked SN material being injected into an extant protoplanetary disk, or isotropically expanding ejecta sweeping over a distant (>10 pc) cloud core, simultaneously enriching it and triggering its collapse. Here we consider a new astrophysical setting: the injection of clumpy SN ejecta, as observed in the Cas A SN remnant, into the molecular gas at the periphery of an HII region created by the SN's progenitor star. To track these interactions we have conducted a suite of high-resolution (1500^3 effective) 3D simulations that follow the evolution of individual clumps as they move into molecular gas. Even at these high resolutions, our simulations do not quite achieve numerical convergence, due to the challenge of properly resolving the small-scale mixing of ejecta and molecular gas, although they do allow some robust conclusions to be drawn. Isotropically exploding ejecta do not penetrate into the molecular cloud, but, if cooling is properly accounted for, clumpy ejecta penetrate to distances ~10^18 cm and mix effectively with star-forming molecular gas. The ~2 M_\odot high-metallicity ejecta from a core-collapse SN is likely to mix with ~2 \times 10^4 M_\odot of molecular gas. Thus all stars forming late (~5 Myr) in the evolution of an HII region may be contaminated by SN ejecta at a level ~10^-4. This level of contamination is consistent with the abundances of short-lived radionuclides and possibly some stable isotopic shifts in the early solar system, and is potentially consistent with the observed variability in stellar elemental abundances. SN contamination of forming planetary systems may be a common, universal process.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.