Paper detail

Mixed subdivisions suitable for the Canny-Emiris formula

The Canny-Emiris formula gives the sparse resultant as the ratio of the determinant of a Sylvester-type matrix over a minor of it, both obtained via a mixed subdivision algorithm. The same authors gave an explicit class of mixed subdivisions for the greedy approach so that the formula holds, and the dimension of the constructed matrices is smaller than that of the subdivision algorithm, following the approach of Canny and Pedersen. Our method improves upon the dimensions of the matrices when the Newton polytopes are zonotopes and the systems are multihomogeneous. In this text, we provide more such cases, and we conjecture which might be the liftings providing minimal size of the resultant matrices. We also describe two applications of this formula, namely in computer vision and in the implicitization of surfaces, while offering the corresponding JULIA code. We finally introduce a novel tropical approach that leads to an alternative proof of one of the results.

preprint2024arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.