Paper detail

Mixed multiplicities of arbitrary modules

Let $(R, \mathfrak m)$ be a Noetherian local ring. In this work we extend the notion of mixed multiplicities of modules, given in \cite{Kleiman-Thorup2} and \cite{Kirby-Rees1} (see also \cite{Bedregal-Perez}), to an arbitrary family $E,E_1,..., E_q$ of $R$-submodules of $R^p$ with $E$ of finite colength. We prove that these mixed multiplicities coincide with the Buchsbaum-Rim multiplicity of some suitable $R$-module. In particular, we recover the fundamental Rees's mixed multiplicity theorem for modules, which was proved first by Kirby and Rees in \cite{Kirby-Rees1} and recently also proved by the authors in \cite{Bedregal-Perez}. Our work is based on, and extend to this new context, the results on mixed multiplicities of ideals obtained by Viêt in \cite{Viet8} and Manh and Viêt in \cite{Manh-Viet}. We also extend to this new setting some of the main results of Trung in \cite{Trung} and Trung and Verma in \cite{Trung-Verma1}. As in \cite{Kleiman-Thorup2}, \cite{Kirby-Rees1} and \cite{Bedregal-Perez}, we actually work in the more general context of standard graded $R$-algebras.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.