Paper detail

Mixed Anhydrides at the Intersection Between Peptide and RNA Autocatalytic Sets: Evolution of Biological Coding

We present a scenario for the origin of biological coding. In this context, coding is a semiotic relationship between chemical information stored in one location that links to chemical information stored in a separate location. Coding originated by the cooperative interaction of two, originally separate collectively autocatalytic sets, one for nucleic acids and one for peptides. When these two sets interacted, a series of RNA-folding-directed processes led to their joint cooperativity. The amino acyl adenylate, today amino acid-AMP, was the first covalent association made by these two collectively autocatalytic sets and solidified their interdependence. This molecule is a palimpsest of this era, and is a relic of the original semiotic, and thus coding, relationship between RNA and proteins. More defined coding was driven by selection pressure to eliminate waste in the collective autocatalytic sets. Eventually a 1:1 relationship between single amino acids and short RNA pieces (e.g., three nucleotides) was established, leading to what is today known as the genetic code. Transfer RNA aminoacylating enzymes, or aaRSs, arose concomitantly with the advent of specific coding. The two classes of aaRS enzymes are remnants of the duality of complementary information in two nucleic acid strands, as originally postulated by Rodin and Ohno. Every stage in the evolution of coding was driven by the downward selection on the components of a system to satisfy the Kantian whole. Coding was ultimately forced because there were at least two chemically distinct classes of polymers needed for open-ended evolution; systems with only one polymer cannot exhibit this characteristic. Coding is thus synonymous with life as we know it, and can be thought of as a phase transition in the history of the universe.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.