Paper detail

MixCL: Pixel label matters to contrastive learning

Contrastive learning and self-supervised techniques have gained prevalence in computer vision for the past few years. It is essential for medical image analysis, which is often notorious for its lack of annotations. Most existing self-supervised methods applied in natural imaging tasks focus on designing proxy tasks for unlabeled data. For example, contrastive learning is often based on the fact that an image and its transformed version share the same identity. However, pixel annotations contain much valuable information for medical image segmentation, which is largely ignored in contrastive learning. In this work, we propose a novel pre-training framework called Mixed Contrastive Learning (MixCL) that leverages both image identities and pixel labels for better modeling by maintaining identity consistency, label consistency, and reconstruction consistency together. Consequently, thus pre-trained model has more robust representations that characterize medical images. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, improving the baseline by 5.28% and 14.12% in Dice coefficient when 5% labeled data of Spleen and 15% of BTVC are used in fine-tuning, respectively.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.