Paper detail

Mitigating Spatial Error in the iterative-Quasi-Monte Carlo (iQMC) Method for Neutron Transport Simulations with Linear Discontinuous Source Tilting and Effective Scattering and Fission Rate Tallies

The iterative Quasi-Monte Carlo (iQMC) method is a recently proposed method for multigroup neutron transport simulations. iQMC can be viewed as a hybrid between deterministic iterative techniques, Monte Carlo simulation, and Quasi-Monte Carlo techniques. iQMC holds several algorithmic characteristics that make it desirable for high performance computing environments including a $O(N^{-1})$ convergence scheme, ray tracing transport sweep, and highly parallelizable nature similar to analog Monte Carlo. While there are many potential advantages of using iQMC there are also inherent disadvantages, namely the spatial discretization error introduced from the use of a mesh across the domain. This work introduces two significant modifications to iQMC to help reduce the spatial discretization error. The first is an effective source transport sweep, whereby the source strength is updated on-the-fly via an additional tally. This version of the transport sweep is essentially agnostic to the mesh, material, and geometry. The second is the addition of a history-based linear discontinuous source tilting method. Traditionally, iQMC utilizes a piecewise-constant source in each cell of the mesh. However, through the proposed source tilting technique iQMC can utilize a piecewise-linear source in each cell and reduce spatial error without refining the mesh. Numerical results are presented from the 2D C5G7 and Takeda-1 k-eigenvalue benchmark problems. Results show that the history-based source tilting significantly reduces error in global tallies and the eigenvalue solution in both benchmarks. Through the effective source transport sweep and linear source tilting iQMC was able to converge the eigenvalue from the 2D C5G7 problem to less than $0.04\%$ error on a uniform Cartesian mesh with only $204\times204$ cells.

preprint2024arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.