Paper detail

Mitigating Bias in CMB B-modes from Foreground Cleaning Using a Moment Expansion

One of the primary challenges facing upcoming CMB polarization experiments aiming to measure the inflationary B-mode signal is the removal of polarized foregrounds. The thermal dust foreground is often modeled as a single modified blackbody, however overly simplistic foreground models can bias measurements of the tensor-to-scalar ratio r. As CMB polarization experiments become increasingly sensitive, thermal dust emission models must account for greater complexity in the dust foreground while making minimal assumptions about the underlying distribution of dust properties within a beam. We use Planck dust temperature data to estimate the typical variation in dust properties along the line of sight and examine the impact of these variations on the bias in r if a single modified blackbody model is assumed. We then assess the ability of the moment method to capture the effects of spatial averaging and to reduce bias in the tensor-to-scalar ratio for different possible toy models of dust emission. We find that the expected bias due to temperature variations along the line of sight is significant compared to the target sensitivities of future CMB experiments, and that the use of the moment method could reduce bias as well as shed light into the distribution of dust physical parameters.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.