Paper detail

Missing Red Supergiants and Carbon Burning

Recent studies on direct imaging of Type II core-collapse supernova progenitors indicate a possible threshold around $M_{\rm ZAMS}\sim 16-20$ M$_\odot$, where red supergiants with larger birth masses do not appear to result in supernova explosions and instead implode directly into a black hole. In this study we argue that it is not a coincidence that this threshold closely matches the critical transition of central Carbon burning in massive stars from the convective to radiative regime. In lighter stars, Carbon burns convectively in the center and result in compact final presupernova cores that are likely to result in explosions, while in heavier stars after the transition, it burns as a radiative flame and the stellar cores become significantly harder to explode. Using the KEPLER code we demonstrate the sensitivity of this transition to the rate of $^{12}$C$(α,γ)^{16}$O reaction and the overshoot mixing efficiency, and we argue that the upper mass limit of exploding red supergiants could be employed to constrain uncertain input physics of massive stellar evolution calculations. The initial mass corresponding to the central Carbon burning transition range from 14 to 26 M$_\odot$ in recently published models from various groups and codes, and only a few are in agreement with the estimates inferred from direct imaging studies.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.