Paper detail

Mirror versus naive assignment in chiral models for the nucleon

In the framework of chiral model(s) based on the linear realization of chiral symmetry, we investigate the low-energy phenomenological properties of the nucleon and its chiral partner (identified with either $N(1535)$ or $N(1650)$) in the naive assignment and compare the results with the ones obtained in the mirror assignment. We find that, within the naive assignment, we are not able to reproduce the experimental value of the isospin-odd scattering length, while the mirror assignment is in good agreement with it for both choices $N(1535)$ and $N(1650)$. The isospin-even scattering length is not yet conclusive in either assignment because it depends crucially on the poorly known scalar mesonic sector. The decay with $Γ_{N(1535)\rightarrow Nη}$ turns out to be far too small in both the naive and mirror assignments, while $Γ_{N(1650)\rightarrow Nη}$ is described correctly by both of them. In conclusions, the mirror assignment with $N(1650)$ as the chiral partner of the nucleon is the favored configuration.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.