Paper detail

Mirror Twin Higgs Cosmology: Constraints and a Possible Resolution to the $H_0$ and $S_8$ Tensions

The mirror twin Higgs model (MTH) is a solution to the Higgs hierarchy problem that provides well-predicted cosmological signatures with only three extra parameters: the temperature of the twin sector, the abundance of twin baryons, and the vacuum expectation value (VEV) of twin electroweak symmetry breaking. These parameters specify the behavior of twin radiation and the acoustic oscillations of twin baryons, which lead to testable effects on the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and large-scale structure (LSS). While collider searches can only probe the twin VEV, through a fit to cosmological data we show that the existing CMB (Planck18 TTTEEE+lowE+lowT+lensing) and LSS (KV450) data already provide useful constraints on the remaining MTH parameters. Additionally, we show that the presence of twin radiation in this model can raise the Hubble constant $H_0$ while the scattering twin baryons can reduce the matter fluctuations $S_8$, which helps to relax the observed $H_0$ and $S_8$ tensions simultaneously. This scenario is different from the typical $Λ$CDM + $ΔN_{\rm eff}$ model, in which extra radiation helps with the Hubble tension but worsens the $S_8$ tension. For instance, when including the SH0ES and Planck SZ data in the fit, we find that a universe with $\gtrsim 20\%$ of the dark matter comprised of twin baryons is preferred over $Λ$CDM by $\sim4σ$. If the twin sector is indeed responsible for resolving the $H_0$ and $S_8$ tensions, future measurements from the Euclid satellite and CMB Stage 4 experiment will further measure the twin parameters to $O(1-10\%)$-level precision. Our study demonstrates how models with hidden naturalness can potentially be probed using precision cosmological data.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.