Paper detail

MIRACLES: atmospheric characterization of directly imaged planets and substellar companions at 4-5 $μ$m. II. Constraints on the mass and radius of the enshrouded planet PDS 70 b

The circumstellar disk of PDS 70 hosts two forming planets, which are actively accreting gas from their environment. In this work, we report the first detection of PDS 70 b in the Br$α$ and $M'$ filters with VLT/NACO, a tentative detection of PDS 70 c in Br$α$, and a reanalysis of archival NACO $L'$ and SPHERE $H23$ and $K12$ imaging data. The near side of the disk is also resolved with the Br$α$ and $M'$ filters, indicating that scattered light is non-negligible at these wavelengths. The spectral energy distribution of PDS 70 b is well described by blackbody emission, for which we constrain the photospheric temperature and photospheric radius to $T_\mathrm{eff}=1193 \pm 20$ K and $R=3.0 \pm 0.2$ $R_\mathrm{J}$. The relatively low bolometric luminosity, $\log(L/L_\odot) = -3.79 \pm 0.02$, in combination with the large radius, is not compatible with standard structure models of fully convective objects. With predictions from such models, and adopting a recent estimate of the accretion rate, we derive a planetary mass and radius in the range of $M_\mathrm{p}\approx 0.5-1.5$ $M_\mathrm{J}$ and $R_\mathrm{p}\approx 1-2.5$ $R_\mathrm{J}$, independently of the age and post-formation entropy of the planet. The blackbody emission, large photospheric radius, and the discrepancy between the photospheric and planetary radius suggests that infrared observations probe an extended, dusty environment around the planet, which obscures the view on its molecular composition. Finally, we derive a rough upper limit on the temperature and radius of potential excess emission from a circumplanetary disk, $T_\mathrm{eff}\lesssim256$ K and $R\lesssim245$ $R_\mathrm{J}$, but we do find weak evidence that the current data favors a model with a single blackbody component.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.