Paper detail

MIPS: Instance Placement for Stream Processing Systems based on Monte Carlo Tree Search

Stream processing engines enable modern systems to conduct large-scale analytics over unbounded data streams in real time. They often view an application as a direct acyclic graph with streams flowing through pipelined instances of various processing units. One key challenge that emerges is instance placement, i.e., to decide the placement of instances across servers with minimum traffic across servers and maximum resource utilization. The challenge roots in not only its intrinsic complexity but also the impact between successive application deployments. Most updated engines such as Apache Heron exploits a more modularized scheduler design that decomposes the task into two stages: One decides the instance-to-container mapping while the other focuses on the container-to-server mapping that is delegated to standalone resource managers. The unaligned objectives and scheduler designs in the two stages may lead to long response times or low utilization. However, so far little work has appeared to address the challenge. Inspired by the recent success of applications of Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) methods in various fields, we develop a novel model to characterize such systems, formulate the problem, and cast each stage of mapping into a sequential decision process. By adopting MCTS methods, we propose MIPS, an MCTS-based Instance Placement Scheme to decide the two-staged mapping in a timely yet efficient manner. In addition, we discuss practical issues and refine MIPS to further improve its performance. Results from extensive simulations show, given mild-value of samples, MIPS outperforms existing schemes with a significant traffic reduction and utilization improvement. To our best knowledge, this paper is the first to study the two-staged mapping problem and to apply MCTS to solving the challenge.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.