Paper detail

Minkowski Functionals of SDSS-III BOSS : Hints of Possible Anisotropy in the Density Field?

We present measurements of the Minkowski functionals extracted from the SDSS-III BOSS catalogs. After defining the Minkowski functionals, we describe how an unbiased reconstruction of these statistics can be obtained from a field with masked regions and survey boundaries, validating our methodology with Gaussian random fields and mock galaxy snapshot data. From the BOSS galaxy data we generate a set of four density fields in three dimensions corresponding to the northern and southern skies of LOWZ and CMASS catalogs, smoothing over large scales such that the field is perturbatively non-Gaussian. We extract the Minkowski functionals from each data set separately, and measure their shapes and amplitudes by fitting a Hermite polynomial expansion. For the shape parameter of the Minkowski functional curves $a_0$, that is related to the bispectrum of the field, we find that the LOWZ-South data presents a systematically lower value of $a_0 = -0.080 \pm 0.040$ than its northern sky counterpart $a_0 = 0.032 \pm 0.024$. Although the significance of this discrepancy is low, it potentially indicates some systematics in the data or that the matter density field exhibits anisotropy at low redshift. By assuming a standard isotropic flat $Λ$CDM cosmology, the amplitudes of Minkowski functionals from the combination of northern and southern sky data give the constraints $Ω_{\rm c} h^2 n_{\rm s} = 0.110 \pm 0.006$ and $0.111 \pm 0.008$ for CMASS and LOWZ, respectively, which is in agreement with the Planck $Λ$CDM best-fit $Ω_{\rm c}h^{2} n_{\rm s} = 0.116 \pm 0.001$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.