Paper detail

Minkowski Functionals of SDSS galaxies I : Analysis of Excursion Sets

We present a first morphometric investigation of a preliminary sample from the SDSS of 154287 galaxies with apparent magnitude 14.5<m_r<17.5 and redshift 0.001<z<0.4. We measure the Minkowski Functionals, which are a complete set of morphological descriptors. To account for the complicated wedge--like geometry of the present survey data, we construct isodensity contour surfaces from the galaxy positions in redshift space and employ two complementary methods of computing the Minkowski Functionals. We find that the observed Minkowski Functionals for SDSS galaxies are consistent with the prediction of a Lambda--dominated spatially--flat Cold Dark Matter model with random--Gaussian initial conditions, within the cosmic variance estimated from the corresponding mock catalogue. We expect that future releases of the SDSS survey will allow us to distinguish morphological differences in the galaxy distribution with regard to different morphological type and luminosity ranges.

preprint2005arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.