Paper detail

Minimum Energy to Send $k$ Bits Over Multiple-Antenna Fading Channels

This paper investigates the minimum energy required to transmit $k$ information bits with a given reliability over a multiple-antenna Rayleigh block-fading channel, with and without channel state information (CSI) at the receiver. No feedback is assumed. It is well known that the ratio between the minimum energy per bit and the noise level converges to $-1.59$ dB as $k$ goes to infinity, regardless of whether CSI is available at the receiver or not. This paper shows that lack of CSI at the receiver causes a slowdown in the speed of convergence to $-1.59$ dB as $k\to\infty$ compared to the case of perfect receiver CSI. Specifically, we show that, in the no-CSI case, the gap to $-1.59$ dB is proportional to $((\log k) /k)^{1/3}$, whereas when perfect CSI is available at the receiver, this gap is proportional to $1/\sqrt{k}$. In both cases, the gap to $-1.59$ dB is independent of the number of transmit antennas and of the channel's coherence time. Numerically, we observe that, when the receiver is equipped with a single antenna, to achieve an energy per bit of $ - 1.5$ dB in the no-CSI case, one needs to transmit at least $7\times 10^7$ information bits, whereas $6\times 10^4$ bits suffice for the case of perfect CSI at the receiver.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.