Paper detail

Minimum-Complexity Failure Correction in Linear Arrays via Compressive Processing

Given an array with defective elements, failure correction (FC) aims at finding a new set of weights for the working elements so that the properties of the original pattern can be recovered. Unlike several FC techniques available in the literature, which update all the working excitations, the Minimum-Complexity Failure Correction (MCFC) problem is addressed in this paper. By properly reformulating the FC problem, the minimum number of corrections of the whole excitations of the array is determined by means of an innovative Compressive Processing (CP) technique in order to afford a pattern as close as possible to the original one (i.e., the array without failures). Selected examples, from a wide set of numerical test cases, are discussed to assess the effectiveness of the proposed approach as well as to compare its performance with other competitive state-of-the-art techniques in terms of both pattern features and number of corrections.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.