Paper detail

Minimum Certificate Dispersal with Tree Structures

Given an n-vertex graph G=(V,E) and a set R \subseteq {{x,y} | x,y \in V} of requests, we consider to assign a set of edges to each vertex in G so that for every request {u, v} in R the union of the edge sets assigned to u and v contains a path from u to v. The Minimum Certificate Dispersal Problem (MCD) is defined as one to find an assignment that minimizes the sum of the cardinality of the edge set assigned to each vertex. This problem has been shown to be LOGAPX-complete for the most general setting, and APX-hard and 2-approximable in polynomial time for dense request sets, where R forms a clique. In this paper, we investigate the complexity of MCD with sparse (tree) structures. We first show that MCD is APX-hard when R is a tree, even a star. We then explore the problem from the viewpoint of the maximum degree Δof the tree: MCD for tree request set with constant Δis solvable in polynomial time, while that with Δ=Ω(n) is 2.56-approximable in polynomial time but hard to approximate within 1.01 unless P=NP. As for the structure of G itself, we show that the problem can be solved in polynomial time if G is a tree.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.