Paper detail

Minimizing gravitational lensing contributions to the primordial bispectrum covariance

The next generation of ground-based CMB experiments aim to measure temperature and polarization fluctuations up to $\ell_{\rm max} \approx 5000$ over half of the sky. Combined with Planck data on large scales, this will provide improved constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity. However, the impressive resolution of these experiments will come at a price. Besides signal confusion from galactic foregrounds, extra-galactic foregrounds and late-time gravitational effects, gravitational lensing will introduce large non-Gaussianity that can become the leading contribution to the bispectrum covariance through the connected 4-point function. Here, we compute this effect analytically for the first time on the full sky for both temperature and polarization. We compare our analytical results with those obtained directly from map-based simulations of the CMB sky for several levels of instrumental noise. Of the standard shapes considered in the literature, the local shape is most affected, resulting in a 35\% increase of the estimator standard deviation for an experiment like the Simons Observatory (SO) and a 110\% increase for a cosmic-variance limited experiment, including both temperature and polarization modes up to $\ell_{\rm max} = 3800$. Because of the nature of the lensing 4-point function, the impact on other shapes is reduced while still non negligible for the orthogonal shape. Two possible avenues to reduce the non-Gaussian contribution to the covariance are proposed. First by marginalizing over lensing contributions, such as the ISW-lensing 3pt function in temperature, and second by delensing the CMB. We show the latter method can remove almost all extra covariance, reducing the effect to below $<$5\% for local bispectra. At the same time, delensing would remove signal biases from secondaries induced by lensing, such as ISW-lensing.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.