Paper detail

Minimizing Degree-based Topological Indices for Trees with Given Number of Pendent Vertices + Erratum

We derive sharp lower bounds for the first and the second Zagreb indices ($M_1$ and $M_2$ respectively) for trees and chemical trees with the given number of pendent vertices and find optimal trees. $M_1$ is minimized by a tree with all internal vertices having degree 4, while $M_2$ is minimized by a tree where each "stem" vertex is incident to 3 or 4 pendent vertices and one internal vertex, while the rest internal vertices are incident to 3 other internal vertices. The technique is shown to generalize to the weighted first Zagreb index, the zeroth order general Randić index, as long as to many other degree-based indices. Later the erratum was added: Theorem 3 says that the second Zagreb index $M_2$ cannot be less than $11n-27$ for a tree with $n\ge 8$ pendent vertices. Yet the tree exists with $n=8$ vertices (the two-sided broom) violating this inequality. The reason is that the proof of Theorem 3 relays on a tacit assumption that an index-minimizing tree contains no vertices of degree 2. This assumption appears to be invalid in general. In this erratum we show that the inequality $M_2 \ge 11n-27$ still holds for trees with $n\ge 9$ vertices and provide the valid proof of the (corrected) Theorem 3.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.