Paper detail

Minimality and uniqueness for decompositions of specific ternary forms

The paper deals with the computation of the rank and the identifiability of a specific ternary form. Often, one knows some short Waring decomposition of a given form, and the problem is to determine whether the decomposition is minimal and unique. We show how the analysis of the Hilbert-Burch matrix of the set of points representing the decomposition can solve this problem in the case of ternary forms. Moreover, when the decomposition is not unique, we show how the procedure of liaison can provide alternative, maybe shorter, decompositions. We give an explicit algorithm that tests our criterion of minimality for the case of ternary forms of degree $9$. This is the first numerical case in which a new phaenomenon appears: the span of $18$ general powers of linear forms contains points of (subgeneric) rank $18$, but it also contains points whose rank is $17$, due to the existence of a second shorter decomposition which is completely different from the given one.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.