Paper detail

Minimal spanning trees and Stein's method

Kesten and Lee [36] proved that the total length of a minimal spanning tree on certain random point configurations in $\mathbb{R}^d$ satisfies a central limit theorem. They also raised the question: how to make these results quantitative? However, techniques employed to tackle the same problem for other functionals studied in geometric probability do not apply directly to the minimal spanning tree. Thus the problem of determining the convergence rate in the central limit theorem for Euclidean minimal spanning trees has remained open. In this work, we establish bounds on the convergence rate for the Poissonized version of this problem by using a variation of Stein's method. We also derive bounds on the convergence rate for the analogous problem in the setup of the lattice $\mathbb{Z}^d$. The contribution of this paper is twofold. First, we develop a general technique to compute convergence rates in central limit theorems satisfied by minimal spanning trees on sequence of weighted graphs which includes minimal spanning trees on Poisson points. Secondly, we present a way of quantifying the Burton-Keane argument for the uniqueness of the infinite open cluster. The latter is interesting in its own right and based on a generalization of our technique, Duminil-Copin, Ioffe and Velenik [28] have recently obtained bounds on probability of two-arm events in a broad class of translation-invariant percolation models.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.