Paper detail

Minimal predictive see-saw model with normal neutrino mass hierarchy

We consider the type I see-saw model with two right-handed neutrinos and a normal neutrino mass hierarchy and impose a zero coupling between the right-handed neutrino mainly responsible for the atmospheric neutrino mass and the electron neutrino. We derive a master formula which relates see-saw input parameters in a one to one correspondence with physical neutrino observables. Using the master formula we search for simple ratios of couplings consistent with current data on neutrino mass and lepton mixing. We discover a minimal predictive example in which the right-handed neutrino mainly responsible for the atmospheric neutrino mass has couplings to (nu_e, nu_mu, nu_tau) proportional to (0,1,1) and the right-handed neutrino mainly responsible for the solar neutrino mass has couplings to (nu_e, nu_mu, nu_tau) proportional to (1,1,3) or (1,3,1), with a relative phase eta = -/+ pi/3, providing the link between leptogenesis and CP violation in neutrino oscillation experiments. We show how these patterns of couplings could arise from an A_4 family symmetry model of leptons which predicts all the PMNS parameters in terms of the neutrino mass ratio m_2/m_3, corresponding to approximate Tri-bimaximal-Cabibbo mixing, accurate to one degree, with the prediction delta = +/- pi/2.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.